What's with the Rs, Bs, WRs, CCs, DCAs, and PTs in the Windows Store XML?

Like Raymond Chen, I spelunk around Windows during my lunch breaks. Today, I came across raw Windows Store XML -- the XML sent down to the Windows Store app on your Windows machine. I noticed immediately that it wasn't your ordinary semantic XML. Instead, the elements had been transformed into shortened, mechanical, almost alien versions, some comprising of only one letter.

Here's a snippet of XML delivered as part of the Where's My Water? 2 page:

<T>Where&#x2019;s My Water? 2</T>
<!-- // Snipped // -->
<!-- // Snipped // -->

Why would anyone name their elements this way?

I suspect this is an optimization to minimize the amount of data streaming from the datacenters hosting the Windows Store. (Or maybe storage on disk?) To compute a rough savings figure here, I copied the XML and replaced all the cryptic element names with saner versions. I then ran both through Visual Studio's document formatting feature (i.e. XML tidy) and gzip'ed them.

Here's a snippet of the cleaned up version:

<Title>Where&#x2019;s My Water? 2</Title>
<!-- // Snipped // -->
<!-- // Snipped // -->

Here are the compression results (using 7-Zip 9.32a 64-bit using a gzip ultra 32KB dictionary and 128 word size):

Original XML: 6,523 bytes
Renamed XML: 8,843 bytes
Difference: 2320 bytes

Gzip'ed original XML: 2,429 bytes
Gzip'ed renamed XML: 2,727 bytes
Difference: 298 bytes

As you can see, the difference between the gzip'ed original and modified XML markup is negligible. Even accounting for 110 million Windows 8 users, we're talking a relatively small savings of ~32.8GB.

Is it worth the extra transformation work on each side? (Think CPU, battery)


I took another look at the requests and replies going back and forth and it turns out, the Windows Store app omits the HTTP Accept-Encoding header that would normally indicate support for gzip'ed content. So it doesn't appear the XML is getting gzip'ed at all. That changes our savings figure to ~255.2GB.

Weird stuff.

A closer look at Windows PowerShell OneGet - Part 1

On Thursday, Distinguished Engineer Jeffrey Snover announced the availability of the Windows Management Framework 5.0 Preview. In tow was Windows PowerShell OneGet, touted as the new way to discover and install software on Windows. But after digging deeper into the preview bits, it’s clear OneGet is much more than a collection of cmdlets.

Let’s take a closer look.


Windows PowerShell OneGet is a bit of a misnomer -- it isn't strictly tied to PowerShell. Instead, OneGet represents a framework of hosts, providers and packages with a core set of APIs at its center. Peeking behind the curtains, we have three main component areas:

The OneGet core API houses all the package discoverability and installation support goop that powers OneGet hosts and providers. Specifically goop in areas such as asynchrony and operating system integration.

OneGet hosts tap into the core API. Typically, their job is to bridge the divide between the user and the API. Windows PowerShell, for example, exposes core functionality by way of handy cmdlets.

Requests from these hosts are relayed by the core to OneGet providers that are responsible for processing requests. The Chocolatey provider, for example, may receive a request for a package it does not have in its local cache. It will hold onto that request and retrieve the information it needs from its Internet-based package repository before responding.

To make that clearer, we'll walk through a simple PowerShell example.

  1. A script or user imports the Windows PowerShell OneGet module, tapping into the OneGet Core API. Install-Package is invoked to find and install the Notepad2 package.
  2. The Windows PowerShell host (hosting the OneGet module) makes a "find package" request via the OneGet Core API.
  3. The OneGet Core API locates a provider able to handle the request and passes it on.
  4. The provider, Chocolatey in this case, receives the request and scurries about, looking for the Notepad2 package. It downloads it from the central Chocolatey repository and proceeds to install it, providing progress and other information along the way. If all goes well, Notepad2 is now installed.

In Part 2, we'll take a closer look at how providers are implemented and try to hack one together.

Coming soon in Windows 8.1 Update 1: Internet Explorer Enterprise Mode


So, a build of Windows 8.1 Update 1 leaked onto the Internet last night. Buried in this build are early bits of what's being called Internet Explorer Enterprise Mode, a feature designed to "improve the compatibility of websites identified by your company".

There's not a lot to play with yet, but I tinkered with it a bit.

It appears to work similarly to the Compatibility View feature first introduced in Internet Explorer 8. One difference is that Enterprise Mode can be configured to consult a list of Enterprise Mode enabled sites via a file on disk or somewhere on the network. This file could contain a list of intranet resources, for example, that need to be rendered in a vintage document mode like IE8.

(Update -- Turns out, I missed Mary Jo Foley's write up on this feature in late January. Oops.)

There were also hints suggesting this mode would have the ability to run in its own sandbox, similar to InPrivate Browsing -- perhaps, and I'm guessing/hoping here, to allow for limited execution of older plugins and awfulware such as Java.


You can turn on a limited version of this feature via a tweak to the registry where the F12 Developer Tools hangs out. Simply open the Registry Editor and navigate to the key HKLM\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main. Add a DWORD value of EnableEnterpriseModeMenuOption with its data set to 1. Finally, mash the F12 key in a new IE window instance and you should see a enterprise new browser profile in the Emulation area.


Disable Skype integration in Outlook.com and SkyDrive


A little over nine months ago, Microsoft rolled out Skype for Outlook.com. This new integration allows users to instant message, make phone calls and even send and receive video -- right from the web browser. It sounds great, but as my colleague Paul Thurrott pointed out then, it comes with a crippling incoming call notification that won't stop ringing after you answer the call with one of the many other applications or devices ringing.

I thought abandoning Outlook.com would be the cure, but Microsoft rolled this integration into SkyDrive too.

Determined to fix this, I ran Outlook.com through Fiddler and noticed Skype code was pulled down and initialized asynchronously from scripts hosted on skypewebexperience.live.com. I thought of various solutions involving DOM manipulation and code injection to unhook Skype, but opted for a simpler brute-force approach: I just pointed the sub-domain to via the HOSTS file (effectively blocking it).

And aside from some minor scripting errors that appear in the browser console, it worked. It even worked in SkyDrive.

Good riddance.

Step-by-step instructions:

  1. Open Notepad as an administrator
  2. Open the file \Windows\System32\Drivers\Etc\Hosts
  3. At the end of the file, add skypewebexperience.live.com and save.
  4. Close Notepad and restart SkyDrive/Outlook.com browser instances.

PSA: Wireless display (Miracast) support is broken on the Surface Pro [now fixed]

With the release of the Windows 8.1 GA rollup (KB2883200), Microsoft seems to have inadvertently broken wireless display (Miracast) support on the Surface Pro.

Affected users will have trouble discovering Miracast capable devices, such as the NETGEAR Push2TV and ActionTec ScreenBeam.

Fix: New Marvell AVASTAR drivers (14.69.24044.150) are available in, funny enough, the Surface Pro 2 driver and firmware pack. They apply to the Surface Pro as well. I'm told these will eventually be pushed out via WU as well. [added 10/25/2013]

It's not clear where the fault lies, but I suspect we'll be seeing updated wireless drivers (Marvell AVASTAR 350N) in the very near future.

Stay tuned. 

For more information on Miracast support in Windows 8.1, check out my previous article